I use content from wikipedia as well. Not directly though, i rewrite every sentence i copy and then incorporate in on my blog. And wikipedia articles happen to be free, so copying them shouldn't get into any legal troubles,
I use content from wikipedia as well. Not directly though, i rewrite every sentence i copy and then incorporate in on my blog. And wikipedia articles happen to be free, so copying them shouldn't get into any legal troubles,
Follow me on Twitter: @hendricius
There are plenty of factual errors in Wikipedia. They sometimes flag the articles that they cannot verify with a notice that the content needs verification. It can be difficult to verify the facts in a Wikipedia article, because sometimes there are very few sources where you can verify the facts and weed out the opinions.
You can have it fast, good or cheap. Pick any two.
There are tons of factual errors in Wikipedia articles! I never rely on anything in Wikipedia, unless I confirm it with other, more reliable sources.
Here's why - back when I was in TV news, there was an anchor that no one liked, so a couple of the employees made up a Wikipedia page about him. The content was hilarious - albeit, mostly untrue and downright ridiculous! To my knowledge, it's still up. So much for fact-checking!
Does your web content need a pick-me-up? Looking for a professional article writing service? At Premier Content Source, we offer SEO content writing services that grab readers' attention!
Although there are factual errors, I do tend to rewrite everything that I might use from Wikipedia, and I like to actually check the content (and what I say) before I post it.
Most of the more popular topics, though, are pretty correct.
Got a Positive Attitude? I am an internet marketing consultant in the Dallas Texas area.
Submit Your Webmaster Related Sites to the NB Directory
I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
Bookmarks