Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Using Wikipedia Content

  1. #1
    DickTracy is offline Newbie Net Builder
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    116
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 19 Times in 12 Posts

    Using Wikipedia Content

    A new trend I've noticed recently is for very large sites to incorporate wikipedia in their own results eg
    bing: http://www.bing.com/reference/semhtml/Zeus
    and orange: Zeus - Encyclopédie par wikipédia - Orange
    rather than link out to wikipedia
    orange is interesting because they have also incorporated ads in the text

    do you think this serves a useful function for content creation? if not why would these companies be doing it?

    also do you think they have downloaded the whole of wikipedia or do it page by page 'on-the-fly" somehow with cURL etc?

  2. #2
    Will.Spencer's Avatar
    Will.Spencer is offline Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    5,033
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    1,010
    Thanked 2,329 Times in 1,259 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DickTracy View Post
    A new trend I've noticed recently is for very large sites to incorporate wikipedia in their own results...
    OpenFacts maintains a list of Copies of Wikipedia Content

    Quote Originally Posted by DickTracy View Post
    do you think this serves a useful function for content creation? if not why would these companies be doing it?
    It seems to work well if you:
    • Have a good amount of domain authority
    • Enrich each page with additional content so that you can rank for something unique


    Quote Originally Posted by DickTracy View Post
    also do you think they have downloaded the whole of wikipedia or do it page by page 'on-the-fly" somehow with cURL etc?
    They download a compressed archive of Wikipedia from Wikimedia Downloads.
    Submit Your Webmaster Related Sites to the NB Directory
    I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.

  3. Thanked by:

    anantshri (30 April, 2010), dmi (15 January, 2010)

  4. #3
    hambo is offline Unknown Net Builder
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    Personally I wouldnt do it unless I felt that it would give some benefit to visitors to the site. My preference is to link out to wikipedia, I have thing about keeping my sites content as unique as possible.
    I build and maintain a website about dehumidifiers I've even started a blog about them!

  5. #4
    TopDogger's Avatar
    TopDogger is online now Über Hund
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hellfire, AZ
    Posts
    3,078
    Thanks
    347
    Thanked 913 Times in 697 Posts
    You will eventually get hit by the duplicate content filters if you use Wikipedia content verbatim. I don't think Bing is very concerned about that, but most sites will never develop an authority level greater than Wikipedia.

    I suggest that you either completely re-write the content, or as Will suggests, add additional content. If you are going to add content, try to add more content than that which you copy from Wikipedia. You might still get caught by the filters when you do this.

    I frequently use Wikipedia for research, but I never copy their content. As an SEO professional with 13 years of experience, I have seen way too many sites that have been wacked by G for using duplicate content, which makes me a bit paranoid about it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Will.Spencer View Post
    They download a compressed archive of Wikipedia from Wikimedia Downloads.
    Wow! That has to be one heck of a large file.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin


  6. #5
    Shenron's Avatar
    Shenron is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,900
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    561
    Thanked 548 Times in 368 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TopDogger View Post

    Wow! That has to be one heck of a large file.
    http://download.wikimedia.org/backup-index.html

    So yes, somehow HUGE!

  7. #6
    hambo is offline Unknown Net Builder
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    As others have said I think most people would get hit by the duplicate content filters. My personal preference is to link out to wikipedia, I think it gives a better user experience. There are certainly quite a few sites now that scrape wikipedia for content.

    As for rewriting wikipedia content, I think its better if you can write something yourself from scratch, trying to rework a wikipedia article tends to end up with something very similar to the original.
    I build and maintain a website about dehumidifiers I've even started a blog about them!

  8. #7
    egoistic is offline Unknown Net Builder
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Wikipedia and wiki answers can easily rank in google for your company name, having your wikipage on the first page of search engines can easily attract customers. Like for example, in the first page of search engine you have your geo or google map, your domain site and wiki on the first page of search engine will enable you to to acquire mo traffic.

  9. #8
    Andy101's Avatar
    Andy101 is online now Code Otaku
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Kanazawa
    Posts
    1,264
    Thanks
    173
    Thanked 304 Times in 231 Posts
    If you display the appropriate Creative Commons attribution, then I don't see why G would whack your site. It should simply be a case of the page not ranking well if it is too similar to the original content.

    If you are not breaking the law, it should be OK.

    Same for Yahoo answers. They insist that you display "Powered by Yahoo! Answers" on your page, so if you leave this out, then you could expect your site to be flagged/reported as a spam site.

    If you are using plugins to feed content to your sites, I would check these things out.

  10. #9
    Priyojeet's Avatar
    Priyojeet is offline Pooja.Priyo Content Writing Services
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    19
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    There is a lot that has made the news in terms of Wikipedia content. There are factual errors that many have reported, however, as I understand they have an airtight process and before anything goes online it thoroughly checked.

    However, a recent American study has revealed that there still are many cases of content errors in Wikipedia and that it should not always be considered as the most reliable content site

  11. #10
    garfish's Avatar
    garfish is offline I'm Not Sure.
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    848
    Blog Entries
    12
    Thanks
    155
    Thanked 57 Times in 54 Posts
    would i still get hit by duplicate content filters even when i just copied [one or two paragraph] portion of a page in wiki and link it to the original?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Ranking above Wikipedia
    By tetrapak in forum Promoting
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 9 January, 2012, 22:30 PM
  2. Mark Zuckerberg - Wikipedia
    By GeeOne in forum General Chat
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 9 December, 2010, 15:24 PM
  3. Adding Links to Wikipedia
    By anantshri in forum Promoting
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 6 July, 2010, 11:51 AM
  4. HideMyAss Beats Wikipedia!
    By Will.Spencer in forum Web Proxies
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 29 August, 2009, 13:06 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12 June, 2009, 06:42 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •