Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: What defines quality content?

  1. #31
    CoreyFreeman's Avatar
    CoreyFreeman is offline Experienced Net Builder
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    NC, USA
    Posts
    692
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked 55 Times in 47 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by akira07 View Post
    @harish
    definitely wrong
    Do you know the mean of unique article? It's different from other. But different is not mean high quality.

    Just for easy explaining, i'm using this example :
    People write about tobacco, the article is about tobbaco effect, tobbaco composition, etc...but you because wanna become unique, write about people who smoke in my class. It's tobacco related and unique, but do you hink it's quality content?
    People can't really have wrong opinions. And an article about kids who smoke in school could be both unique and interesting.

  2. #32
    akira07's Avatar
    akira07 is offline Experienced Net Builder
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    515
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sneakyheathen View Post
    People can't really have wrong opinions. And an article about kids who smoke in school could be both unique and interesting.
    And we're in talking about quality, not about unique and interesting . For me, to make interesting article is so easy, just embed interesting youtube video on your blog and below it write a some opinion about that video, it's interesting also but low quality.

    Sorry if i'm wrong, it's just my opinion...

  3. #33
    gloson's Avatar
    gloson is offline Net Builder
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    153
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by akira07 View Post
    And we're in talking about quality, not about unique and interesting . For me, to make interesting article is so easy, just embed interesting youtube video on your blog and below it write a some opinion about that video, it's interesting also but low quality.

    Sorry if i'm wrong, it's just my opinion...
    For me, interesting is quality. If something manages to get my interest, I would consider it quality because I like it.

    If you embed an interesting video and write a interesting/quality review about it, it will be quality anyway.
    Gloson Blog - How-tos, tips, and more!
    Poetry Talents - Funny poetry for kids!

    Twitter - @Gloson

  4. #34
    akira07's Avatar
    akira07 is offline Experienced Net Builder
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    515
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    So, make quality article is not hard at all

    Yeah but it's depend on each people opinion. One can see content A is quality, but the othr can see content A is so bad. It's depend on people opinion, interest, knowledge, experience, etc.

  5. #35
    lethalboom's Avatar
    lethalboom is offline Experienced Net Builder
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    550
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    So, basically, what I've been saying all along?

    Quality is in the eye of the beholder. Ever heard the phrase 'One man's trash is the next man's treasure'? Well, I think that applies to content, too.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12 May, 2011, 18:38 PM
  2. [WTS] Do you want Quality Content? Then Don't Look Further
    By kichu1988 in forum Content
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 13 November, 2009, 13:32 PM
  3. [WTS] Get Quality Content Here!!
    By varnika in forum Services
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 31 October, 2009, 13:18 PM
  4. [WTS] Quality Web Content
    By gavenecko in forum Services
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12 June, 2009, 09:24 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 6 June, 2009, 19:43 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •