Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Al Gore to Become Part of Al-Jazeera

  1. #1

    Al Gore to Become Part of Al-Jazeera

    This almost unbelievable, but maybe not. Al Gore sold his failing liberal Current TV cable station to Al-Jazeera. The new station will be called Al-Jazeera America. Gore is now on the Al-Jazeera advisory board.


    Al-Jazeera seen as using Al Gore to bolster network's legitimacy in United States | The Daily Caller
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin


  2. #2
    Lol. No idea if that's true, but old Al has been in the propaganda biz for years, so it wouldnt be much of a change.

    I do find it touchingly naive that somebody overseas thinks being associated with him makes a message MORE credible.
    -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup. --

  3. #3
    He would not sell to Beck because Beck is not his kind of person.
    Guess islamic terrorists are more his kind of people.
    Plus the sale was structured so that Fatass Gore will not pay much in the way of taxes.

    Time Warner immediately dropped current.tv from it's cable offerings, which pissed off the new york times.

  4. If we did a survey to see whether Glenn Beck or Al Jazeera was more factual, I know which one would win that comparison.
    phpLD Success Stories 2012 - see what people who use phpLD have done!
    10 SEO Mistakes Directory Owners Make - Let's do better in 2013!

  5. #5
    Actually, al jazeera is more factual than our own media when it comes to what is happening in arab countries.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by dvduval View Post
    If we did a survey to see whether Glenn Beck or Al Jazeera was more factual, I know which one would win that comparison.
    They both push the limits quite a bit, but anyone who actually does investigate the facts would likely vote in favor of Beck. His research connects the dots better than anyone I have ever seen. I don't agree with everything he says, but you can investigate his claims and you will find almost all to be factual. You are not likely to come to the same conclusion with Gore's claims.

    Al Gore continually cites environmental facts that are not facts at all. They are mainly opinions formed by scientists who are being paid by grants intended to further the man-made global warming myth. There is lots of money to be made by scientists who fall in line with the official view. Scientists live on grants and there is plenty of funding for global warming research, but the grants have repeatedly been cancelled for any scientist whose conclusion does not agree with the official view.

    Is global warming occurring? Yes it is, but the planet has been getting warmer since the end of the Little Ice Age, which ended around 1850. Both NASA and Science.com also report that the sun has been putting out more energy since they started tracking solar radiation. There have also been two time periods in the past 2000 years that were much warmer than today: The Roman Period and the Medieval Period. The Medieval Period was followed by The Little Ice Age where for almost 500 years the temperatures in the civilized world was much colder than today. All of this is documented in books and on the web.

    Al Gore's premise that virtually all scientists are in agreement that global warming caused by man ignores the fact that a growing number of global scientists disagree with his statement. These same scientists periodically file an objection with the US Senate.

    These are posted on the US Senate web site, but you will never hear about them in the mainstream media. The latest report has not been posted, which is no surprise given the guy in charge of the Senate. It has over 1000 scientists on the dissenting list and who disagree with Al Gore and the official UN view. It is interesting to read the comments made by the dissenting scientists in the reports.

    .: U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works :: Minority Page :.

    The global warming nuts only look at the warming trends over the summer months. They ignore the cooling trends in the winter. We have had several record cold winters over the past several years. The net effect when one offsets the other is that there has not been any average global warming for the past 16 years. If the ice caps are melting at the rate the global warming nuts claim, the oceans would have risen by at least a few feed by now. How much have they risen? Nada.

    Global warming stopped 16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released... and here is the chart to prove it | Mail Online
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin


Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •