Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Neocon Ann Coulter Calls Libertarians 'Pussies' & Gets Booed By Room Full Of Students

  1. #1

    Neocon Ann Coulter Calls Libertarians 'Pussies' & Gets Booed By Room Full Of Students

    What do you get when you invite outspoken Neo-Conservative War Hawk Ann Coulter to debate outspoken libertarian John Stossel in front of an audience of 1,000+ libertarian students?


    I really don't like the Neo-Conservative extremists.

    I love Ron Paul

  2. #2
    Ann Coulter is good for raising the important issues to new levels and she loves controversy. You don't have to believe in evreything she says, but it gives you something to think about.

    I also like Ron Paul and read his book. The book is full of problems that he laid out in detail, but he didn't offer any answers--at least in the book. The book was more education than an actual manifesto. He has discussed some good ideas in other media outlets, but most of the things that his followers believe he would do are not within the power of the president to do. Yeah I know, someone should explain that to Obama.

    I also find it curious that Ron Paul seems to attract many left-wingers, as well as Libertarians. When he ran for president, his base was not made up primarily of Libertarians. I knew many people who I would call extremely liberal who would have voted for Ron Paul just because of their deep mistrust of the government. I think Ron is more of an anti-politician personality.

    Ron Paul will not run for president again, but it looks like Rand Paul may do so in 2016. Rand Paul does not seem to attract the extreme left-wing personalities like his dad did. He is more of a Tea Party candidate, so at this point we do not know how successful he would be. I would like to see a rise of the Libertarian party. It is the best answer to as an anti-Progressive-Obama party. The Tea Party is a better fit for the Libertarian party, but the Republicans hold the conservative party power.
    Last edited by TopDogger; 23 February, 2013 at 12:18 PM.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin


  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by TopDogger View Post
    I also find it curious that Ron Paul seems to attract many left-wingers, as well as Libertarians. When he ran for president, his base was not made up primarily of Libertarians. I knew many people who I would call extremely liberal who would have voted for Ron Paul just because of their deep mistrust of the government. I think Ron is more of an anti-politician personality.
    I believe that Ron Paul wasn't an elitist, that's the main reason he attracted a lot of people. That explain how he went after the establisment, federal reserve, big government. The message of peace and taking care of our business rather than be the police of the world was pretty interesting particularly all the money spent in overseas military presence, military bases and money given to the rogue countries hating us that could have helped more the economy, the American people and this country. In my opinion I would rather invest a lot in our defense and our intervention power. Now we are broke and it is much more dangerous because it could affect the potential to defend this great country when others rogue countries are arming to the teeth.

    Ron Paul will not run for president again, but it looks like Rand Paul may do so in 2016. Rand Paul does not seem to attract the extreme left-wing personalities like his dad did. He is more of a Tea Party candidate, so at this point we do not know how successful he would be. I would like to see a rise of the Libertarian party. It is the best answer to as an anti-Progressive-Obama party. The Tea Party is a better fit for the Libertarian party, but the Republicans hold the conservative party power.
    I don't thing that Ron Paul was attracting the left wing, but rather the people who vote either for Democrats or Republicans in the past, perhaps the center was more sensitive to the Ron Paul messages. Rand Paul need to prove what he is capable, I remember that the Tea Party was very mad when he endorsed Mitt Romney.

    Anyway, when there is a honest man running for President with great ideas and not choosen by the bilderberg group, or other powerful influent think tanks, you aren't going to make it.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •