Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Put Me In Charge

  1. #1

    Put Me In Charge

    This one is being passed around via e-mail. I don't know if it is real, but it shows deep wisdom and a common sense plan that could not possible make it through our entitlement-driven political system. It would be deemed cruel and unusual. The last part would make it impossible for Democrats to get elected.



    This was written by a 21 year old female who gets it. It's her future she's worried about and this is how she feels about the social welfare big government state that she's being forced to live in! These solutions are just common sense in her opinion.

    This was in the Waco Tribune Herald, Waco , TX , Nov 18, 2011

    PUT ME IN CHARGE . . .

    Put me in charge of food stamps. I'd get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho's, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.

    Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I'd do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we'll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, or smoke, then get a job.

    Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your home" will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.

    In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the "common good.."

    Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self esteem," consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone else's money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem.

    If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

    AND While you are on Gov't subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes, that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov't welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin


  2. #2
    So like dude, don't be harsh. You're violating my rights and stuff.

    Quote Originally Posted by TopDogger View Post
    This one is being passed around via e-mail. I don't know if it is real, but it shows deep wisdom and a common sense plan that could not possible make it through our entitlement-driven political system. It would be deemed cruel and unusual. The last part would make it impossible for Democrats to get elected.



    This was written by a 21 year old female who gets it. It's her future she's worried about and this is how she feels about the social welfare big government state that she's being forced to live in! These solutions are just common sense in her opinion.

    This was in the Waco Tribune Herald, Waco , TX , Nov 18, 2011

    PUT ME IN CHARGE . . .

    Put me in charge of food stamps. I'd get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho's, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.

    Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I'd do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we'll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, or smoke, then get a job.

    Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your home" will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.

    In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the "common good.."

    Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self esteem," consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone else's money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem.

    If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

    AND While you are on Gov't subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes, that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov't welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job.
    I am also a writer for Serpholic Media. You can find some of my articles here: Serpholic Media Blog

  3. #3
    So like dude, don't be harsh. You're violating my rights and stuff.
    Sounds about par for the course. I do agree that being on the dole probably oughta be grounds for not getting to vote, cause yes, it is a conflict. If this election didnt prove that, none will. [I want me a Obamaphone... git rid o Romne, he suck.] There is no reason this Santa Claus vote should sway a national election. And yes, if we are going to have this large a percentage of the nation collecting freebies, it should be tied to a CCC type program.

    While we're at it we need some voter ID laws in place so only the LIVE people and actual citizens vote... and only ONCE. This election was largely decided by inner city horse-shit votes where people voted multiple times. If I really wanted to live in Chicago I'd move there.
    -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup. --

  4. #4
    Wasn't it actually against the law to ask for ID during the primaries? I saw a video on it a while back.
    Quote Originally Posted by robjones View Post
    Sounds about par for the course. I do agree that being on the dole probably oughta be grounds for not getting to vote, cause yes, it is a conflict. If this election didnt prove that, none will. [I want me a Obamaphone... git rid o Romne, he suck.] There is no reason this Santa Claus vote should sway a national election. And yes, if we are going to have this large a percentage of the nation collecting freebies, it should be tied to a CCC type program.

    While we're at it we need some voter ID laws in place so only the LIVE people and actual citizens vote... and only ONCE. This election was largely decided by inner city horse-shit votes where people voted multiple times. If I really wanted to live in Chicago I'd move there.
    I am also a writer for Serpholic Media. You can find some of my articles here: Serpholic Media Blog

  5. #5
    Well, the laws of some states already had a provision requiring ID, and Indiana's had been upheld by the court when the DOJ challenged it already... but those that tried to pass one (Texas, South Carolina) were still stopped by the DOJ on grounds it was discriminatory. [Apparently it hindered the ability for the loyal democrats in cemeteries across the state from exercising their franchise.]


    Meanwhile, the Santa vote was very pro-Obama.

    obamaphone yo.jpg
    -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup. --

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •