Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Members in Chat:

View Poll Results: Content vs Backlinks??

Voters
21. You may not vote on this poll
  • Content

    10 47.62%
  • Backlinks

    11 52.38%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 49
  1. #21
    Sukijus is offline Newbie Net Builder
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    60
    $NetBucks
    235
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    I think if you have a lot of back links you will be positioned better on Google, and get more traffic. If you want to stick with content you need to have perfect content so people would like to link to you. So, I'm choosing back links, but I admit that both of them are important...

  2. Thanked by:

    bogart (11 December, 2009)

  3. #22
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,036
    $NetBucks
    8,321
    Thanked 674 Times in 528 Posts
    Kind of an argument on words. Content is king, but links are the 'Queen of Battle'.

  4. #23
    FemaleAbs's Avatar
    FemaleAbs is offline Newbie Net Builder
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    10
    $NetBucks
    121
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    If I can only choose one, it would be content of course. Google will somehow make its way to you.
    Check out my Female Abs!

  5. #24
    garfish's Avatar
    garfish is online now I'm Not Sure. Recent Blog: Citta Di Mare in SRP Cebu
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    774
    $NetBucks
    2,660
    Blog Entries
    12
    Thanked 49 Times in 46 Posts
    backlinks since i want to get higher pr first to stimulate myself and put more contents

  6. #25
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,036
    $NetBucks
    8,321
    Thanked 674 Times in 528 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by whatthehell View Post
    backlinks since i want to get higher pr first to stimulate myself and put more contents
    I think that way myself. Better to have the traffic and rankings before investing the time and money on content.

    Quote Originally Posted by FemaleAbs View Post
    If I can only choose one, it would be content of course. Google will somehow make its way to you.
    Don't forget that links can bring you referral traffic to bring you readers.

  7. #26
    SEO Service's Avatar
    SEO Service is offline Newbie Net Builder
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    48
    $NetBucks
    240
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Back link will give you rank, if you have unique content it will automatically create back link for you

  8. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Punjab, India
    Posts
    246
    $NetBucks
    925
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    I personally thinks Backlinks are more important. Even If you have a duplicate content site and got a lot of backlinks from good sites, I think it can still rank. What are your opinions on this guys??

  9. #28
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,036
    $NetBucks
    8,321
    Thanked 674 Times in 528 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by wwe_fan9417 View Post
    I personally thinks Backlinks are more important.
    There are two consideration on the importance of backlinks.

    1) Even if your site isn't found on the major search engines, people can find you via your backlinks.
    2) You need backlinks in order for your content to rank well

    Quote Originally Posted by wwe_fan9417 View Post
    Even If you have a duplicate content site and got a lot of backlinks from good sites, I think it can still rank. What are your opinions on this guys??
    Duplicate content appears in the SERPS. I think that you are right that having enough pr will allow the duplicate content to rank at the least within the supplemental index.

  10. #29
    Natural Elements is offline Online Business Owner
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    437
    $NetBucks
    2,052
    Thanked 89 Times in 67 Posts
    I voted for content, contents without backlinks can work if you build internal link anchor texts . If contents do not have links or not a lot, it is hard to rank.

    I see everyday sites without contents, ranking just for the anchor text that are pointed to the site. The problem with this method is not having a better spectrum of all terms in contents that could be emphazed with internal anchor text links. Contents with internal anchor text links can help visitors and search engines to increase traffic. Term with different variations can offer search engines different possibilities to return queries in SERPs.

  11. #30
    budhi1976's Avatar
    budhi1976 is offline Net Builder Recent Blog:
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    369
    $NetBucks
    1,333
    Thanked 69 Times in 52 Posts
    I am planning to give this theory a test. I am going to create a mini site powered by WordPress using 100% duplicate contents (articles, vids, and pics that already published somewhere else) some proven SEO plugins, and going to build a lot of backlinks to it (going to concentrate on article marketing and social bookmarking). Let's see if it works.


    Quote Originally Posted by wwe_fan9417 View Post
    I personally thinks Backlinks are more important. Even If you have a duplicate content site and got a lot of backlinks from good sites, I think it can still rank. What are your opinions on this guys??


 

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 5 February, 2010, 00:51 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 25 January, 2010, 03:19 AM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 30 September, 2009, 12:43 PM
  4. Replies: 28
    Last Post: 29 March, 2009, 16:52 PM
  5. Content VS. Backlinks
    By Karl in forum Promoting
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 25 March, 2009, 05:05 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts