Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Google's June 2010 Update

  1. Google's June 2010 Update

    After seeing many public mentions of Google's May "MayDay" update, I was surprised to see that the June update received almost no public discussion.

    MayDay didn't affect my sites in any noticeable way, but the June update had immediately noticeable and significant effects. About 80% of my approximately 1,300 EMD's and many of my medium (50-500 page) sites lost their rankings in the update.

    Interestingly, this did not have a significant impact on revenue. The affected sites were mostly poor earners to begin with. This update will effect revenue projections for 2011+, when those sites were supposed to really start performing.

    At first, it looked like Google had changed, or even removed, the massive bonus it gives to exact match domains with com, net, and org extensions.

    I was convinced out of that theory because some of my .biz and .us domains were also affected by the update, and because the content pages of many of my newer medium sites were also affected. Nonetheless, EMD's did get hit pretty hard and they provide a wonderful test bed for examining this update.

    The medium sites that lost their rankings included DearTips, HowToPlant, TheShould, WhatCauses, and WhatPain.

    One interesting example of how strange this update was is that HowToPlant got hammered in this update, while GrowGuides was untouched. The two sites are almost clones of each other, although both have unique content. They chase almost the same keywords and they were promoted almost exactly the same.

    Raw PageRank didn't seem to protect sites from the June update. I had many PR3 EMD's lose their ranking in this update.

    Page count also did not seem to help. Many of the one page EMD's were not affected, while some of the EMD's with 10+ pages were affected.

    Thus far I can find no real differences between the sites that were affected and the sites that were not affected. Fexofenadine was dropped from #2 all the way out of the top fifty, but Dicyclomine was untouched. Those sites are almost clones of each other.

    Another example of the apparent randomness of this update is that StrawberryShortcakeRecipe was unaffected, while hundreds of sites extremely similar to it were removed from the SERPs. I do not see any significant difference between that site and many sites that are no longer in the SERPs.

    The strangest thing I am seeing is that the EMD's I built and then never promoted are doing better than the EMD's I built and then promoted lightly. The EMD's which I built and then promoted heavily are doing the best. I can't exactly define "lightly" and "heavily", but it does seem to point to "you need more than article marketing links now."

    Current Theories

    My current theory is that this is some sort of over-optimization penalty. If there is an over-optimization penalty, I have been begging to get hit. I have been using very little anchor text diversity in my link building efforts.

    This also might be related to insufficient linkdomain diversity, as a large portion of my inbound links come from article marketing.

    Tests

    We built a large number of new links using article marketing, but with variant anchor text. This appears to have had zero effect.

    We built a large number of new directory links to a few of the sites. This appears to have had zero effect.

    We built a large number of new profile links to one of the sites. This appears to have had zero effect, but it's too soon to be certain.

    We're build a large number of new links using article marketing, but pointing to the article URL instead of to the index URL. It is too soon to see if this has any effect.

    We need to de-optimize the on-page SEO of a group of our EMDs and watch the results.

    One of my coopetitors has been adding lots of new pages to his EMD's and building links to those pages. That's been getting his index pages back into the SERPS. I'm not sure that I want to do this, as the RoI may not support the additional investment. But... I do have to do a few to test.
    Submit Your Webmaster Related Sites to the NB Directory
    I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.

  2. #2
    Hey Will, what is an EMD?

  3. Quote Originally Posted by browntwn View Post
    Hey Will, what is an EMD?
    Ahh... sorry... my bad. EMD stands for "Exact Match Domain." Google gives a pretty significant bonus to com/net/org domains which exactly match the text of the search. Hyphens or any additional text in the domain name kill the bonus.
    Submit Your Webmaster Related Sites to the NB Directory
    I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Will.Spencer View Post
    Ahh... sorry... my bad. EMD stands for "Exact Match Domain." Google gives a pretty significant bonus to com/net/org domains which exactly match the text of the search. Hyphens or any additional text in the domain name kill the bonus.
    Ahh, I figured it was something simple I should have figured out. Nice piece by the way. I do not have much historical info to share, but I did just launch a bunch of EMD Halloween related sites and they seem to be ranking well - not sure if it is just a temporary victory though. Interestingly, they are ranking in Yahoo which I did not expect.

  5. #5
    My existing EMDs were not affected very much with the June update, but two new sites that I put up in July are not showing the same benefit. I would not say that any of my EMD sites are over-optimized.

    From what I am seeing, Mayday primarily wacked e-commerce sites. AdWords revenues are down, so there must have been a need to drive more site owners to AdWords.

    I attribute the strangeness and lack of uniformity with G's updates to the randomness that we frequently see applied to both their penalties and filters.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin


  6. #6
    same here ....
    my EMD affected in local search result, from rank 13 to no where now

    I don't think is over-optimization penalty cause i build around 10 link permonth for particular keyword

  7. For one particular EMD domain that I have, it has been fluctuating between the number 1 ranking and the number 5 ranking for that keyword phrase. I believe the June update boosted it back up to number 1 but today I'm seeing it down a bit.

    On another domain/site I have that I use for testing only, (there is only one sentence of content on the entire site), the rankings have remained consistent for many many months now with this domain: http://www.teacuppotbellypigs.com/
    Need links? Try AuthorLinks where you can buy or sell links based on Authorship and Klout score. Check out my blog or like me on Facebook.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,772
    This is an interesting blog post concerning Learning from Google Webmaster Tools Caffeine data

    Another very interesting piece of data we are seeing is that although Google is reporting a lot more pages within Webmaster Tools the number of pages indexed by the site: query on Google has dropped for quite a few sites we monitor. This drop appears to be the result of Google being better able to determine which pages are worth displaying in the index.

Similar Threads

  1. Google's Halloween 2010 Update
    By Will.Spencer in forum Promoting
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 4 November, 2010, 23:33 PM
  2. What's Your Biggest Day of Sales since May-Day or 1 June 2010?
    By javanx3d in forum Affiliate Marketing
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 17 September, 2010, 18:34 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 9 January, 2010, 16:29 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •