Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Is Google Going After Sites Not Optimized for Mobile?

  1. #1
    TopDogger's Avatar
    TopDogger is offline Über Hund
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hellfire, AZ
    Posts
    3,102
    Thanks
    349
    Thanked 918 Times in 702 Posts

    Is Google Going After Sites Not Optimized for Mobile?

    I ran across this article, but have not seen any mention of any major Google announcement anywhere.

    Thank You, Google Overlords | TechCrunch

    Running a website not optimized for smartphones? Guess what, you’ve been put on notice. Google is using its influence and the power of its algorithm to finally force web publishers to fix their mobile website configuration issues, or risk getting downranked in Google Search. Directing smartphone users to 404′s? You lose. Sending smartphone users looking for specific content to some generic mobile homepage? See ya. Using Flash for your video embeds on mobile? Farewell. Thank you, Google overlords.
    Is Google's newest vendetta to attack sites with sloppy mobile implementations or lack of optimization for smart phones? Has anyone seen any further details about this?
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin


  2. #2
    iowadawg's Avatar
    iowadawg is online now Free Cell Champion
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Not in Texas
    Posts
    2,139
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks
    170
    Thanked 365 Times in 314 Posts
    You know, at some point in time, Google will make themselves irrelevant to the internet and the world.
    Franc Tireur likes this.

  3. #3
    Franc Tireur is offline Senior Net Builder
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,119
    Thanks
    289
    Thanked 148 Times in 118 Posts
    I like the comment from Timacheson

    "screw you guys who didn’t get on board with this whole mobile trend thing"
    Very amusing, but this is a serious matter. Comedy is a popular tool among propaganda mechanism Google apologists.

  4. #4
    TopDogger's Avatar
    TopDogger is offline Über Hund
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hellfire, AZ
    Posts
    3,102
    Thanks
    349
    Thanked 918 Times in 702 Posts
    I did find a Google announcement related to this.

    Official Google Webmaster Central Blog: Changes in rankings of smartphone search results

    This is very similar to their attempt to force all site owners into social networking. They pushed people into social networking for two years by telling them that it was going to be a ranking factor, and then they quietly abandoned it whey they finally discovered that social networks are such a mess that it is almost impossible to find anything useful in the data to influence rankings.

    Google need to stop trying to force people to use the web as the majority of their 20-something employees like to use it. That has nothing to do with how the majority of users and site owners want to use it. Let the web be the web.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin


  5. #5
    bogart's Avatar
    bogart is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,772
    Thanks
    1,886
    Thanked 776 Times in 609 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TopDogger View Post
    This is very similar to their attempt to force all site owners into social networking. They pushed people into social networking for two years by telling them that it was going to be a ranking factor, and then they quietly abandoned it whey they finally discovered that social networks are such a mess that it is almost impossible to find anything useful in the data to influence rankings.
    This is most likely the case that Google will abandon this as a ranking factor.

    Though, I can see that as more people are using tablets and smartphones designing a website that is optimized for smartphones makes sense.

    This is a good article on how to create mobile optimized websites for Wordpress.

    According to the article, the Twenty Eleven, WordPress’ default theme since version 3.0, is responsive enough for many websites.

  6. #6
    Franc Tireur is offline Senior Net Builder
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,119
    Thanks
    289
    Thanked 148 Times in 118 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TopDogger View Post
    This is very similar to their attempt to force all site owners into social networking. They pushed people into social networking for two years by telling them that it was going to be a ranking factor, and then they quietly abandoned it whey they finally discovered that social networks are such a mess that it is almost impossible to find anything useful in the data to influence rankings.
    The dictatorship of google is overpowering. They always force webmasters to do what they want, they act like if they were our boss.

    There are not recent articles, but if you are gathering all the forcing actions they put on us, it is overwhelming, particularely for the small businesses.

    Google Panda: Forcing Businesses to Create Better Content


    Is Google Forcing Google+ Down People’s Throats? | WebProNews


    Google forcing reviewers to use real names

    google forcing youtube users to give their personal phone numbers?

  7. #7
    TopDogger's Avatar
    TopDogger is offline Über Hund
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hellfire, AZ
    Posts
    3,102
    Thanks
    349
    Thanked 918 Times in 702 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bogart View Post
    According to the article, the Twenty Eleven, WordPress’ default theme since version 3.0, is responsive enough for many websites.
    I am still using TwentyTen as the basis for sites because I found TwentyEleven to be very difficult to work with. TwentyTwelve is supposed to be fully responsive and mobile ready. I will probably take a closer look at that one.

    After reading through all of the Google artilcles I found, it sounds like the ranking issue may only affect mobile searches. In other words, they will likely be giving a ranking preference in mobile searches for mobile sites that are fully compliant. That would make more sense than the original article I found., but it is hard to tell what Google will do. Google is as Google does.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin


  8. Thanked by:

    bogart (16 June, 2013)

  9. #8
    Andy101's Avatar
    Andy101 is offline Code Otaku
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Kanazawa
    Posts
    1,310
    Thanks
    177
    Thanked 309 Times in 236 Posts
    My opinion is that you should design your content layout to be easily re-arranged from wide to narrow. So for a forum like this, there could be a mobile version that lists things such as latest posts. So everything is in a long column of content divs. Scrolling down a screen by wiping the finger is easy. But magnifying a wide page to read text and click on links on a mobile device is a pain.

    Also, the Ad format would need to switch between wide/narrow.

    I have it on my to-do list to work out how to detect what kind of device my site is accessed by (maybe USER AGENT is enough) and switch the layout of the DIVs accordingly. I suspect it will be via CSS3 techniques. But also some PHP to tailor what is downloaded to the browser. Basically, there will be a detector to decide: wide/narrow content delivery. And, the text content should ideally be largely unchanged since it is all under 1 URL.

  10. #9
    TopDogger's Avatar
    TopDogger is offline Über Hund
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hellfire, AZ
    Posts
    3,102
    Thanks
    349
    Thanked 918 Times in 702 Posts
    I find most mobile site designs to be very annoying, including those that re-arrange the layout with a responsive design. For example, the Amazon.com minimalist mobile version is way too simplistic. My iPhone displays a miniature version of a standard web page and I can easily enlarge the sections I want to read. From my perspective, that is the best option for a smart phone.

    There are well over 150 different mobile layouts. If you are going to do a mobile site and want to include all the data on the main site, the responsive design concept is probably the best because it detects the height and width of a user's display and substitutes different style sheets, rather than basing the design solely on the type of device. Even the iPhones have two different resolutions, so basing a layout on the device does not work well. Some mobile designs that I've looked at simply use a 100% width, but then you lose control of the layout.

    Then there is the bandwidth issue. Many cellular network have very low bandwidth. Smart phones using these networks have a difficult time using sites with a lot of content and images. That is where a minimalist design, such as that used by Amazon, would work best.

    Nothing that I have seen thus far is the perfect solution.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin


  11. #10
    Andy101's Avatar
    Andy101 is offline Code Otaku
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Kanazawa
    Posts
    1,310
    Thanks
    177
    Thanked 309 Times in 236 Posts
    I haven't designed a site to target mobile users, but I would tailor my site based on the usage scenario. For example: mobile users checking out their favorite forum may be mostly interested in keeping tabs on responses to their last post and new post topics. Also, I would maybe mimic the UI design of the most popular Apps related to my site content delivery.

    I have an iPhone 4GS and every time I accessed standard web pages with it, it was a pain. But dumbed-down apps are easy to use such as the FB app. Very simple and intuitive mobile interfaces are the way to go IMO.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •