Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Google to Sell Users’ Endorsements

  1. #1
    Franc Tireur is offline Senior Net Builder
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,119
    Thanks
    289
    Thanked 148 Times in 118 Posts

    Google to Sell Users’ Endorsements

    Those long-forgotten posts on social networks, from the pasta someone photographed to the rant about her dentist, are forgotten no more. Social networks want to make them easier to find, and in some cases, to show them in ads.

    Google on Friday announced that it would soon be able to show users’ names, photos, ratings and comments in ads across the Web, endorsing marketers’ products. Facebook already runs similar endorsement ads. But on Thursday it, too, took a step to show personal information more broadly by changing its search settings to make it harder for users to hide from other people trying to find them on the social network.
    Both companies characterized these changes as minor updates. They are, though, the latest example of the continual push by Web companies to collate the reams of personal information shared online in the chase for profits. As Twitter prepares to go public and faces pressures to become profitable, it too will increasingly need to figure out how to make money from the information it collects.
    Google and Facebook say that with the most recent changes, they are trying to offer users more comprehensive and personalized services. The problem, privacy advocates say, is when Web companies use or display the personal information of users in ways the authors did not expect when they originally posted it.
    “People expect when they give information, it’s for a single use, the obvious one,” said Dr. Deborah C. Peel, a psychoanalyst and founder of Patient Privacy Rights, an advocacy group. “That’s why the widening of something you place online makes people unhappy. It feels to them like a breach, a boundary violation.”
    “We set our own boundaries,” she added. “We don’t want them set by the government or Google or Facebook."
    Dr. Peel said the rise of new services like Snapchat, which features person-to-person messages that disappear after they are opened, showed how much people wanted more control over how their information was shared.
    Still, the biggest Internet companies are pushing in the other direction, toward an expectation that more information is shown publicly. Google’s announcement came in an update to its terms of service that allows the company to include in ads adult users’ profile information and preferences, ratings and posts they have made on Google Plus and other Google services like search and YouTube.
    When the new ad policy goes live on Nov. 11, Google will be able to show what the company calls shared endorsements on Google sites and across the Web, on the more than two million sites in Google’s display advertising network, which are viewed by an estimated one billion people. If a user follows a bakery on Google Plus or gives an album four stars on the Google Play music service, for instance, that person’s name, photo and endorsement could show up in ads for that bakery or album.
    Such product endorsements, especially from friends and acquaintances, are a powerful lure to brands, replicating word-of-mouth marketing on a broad scale. Social advertising — which includes a wide range of ads, including endorsements — is a $9.5 billion business, according to eMarketer, accounting for 8 percent of digital ad spending.
    Many users, though, have strong and skeptical feelings about their endorsements being used in ads without their explicit permission. Facebook learned this the hard way when it was sued in a class action by users who claimed the company had not adequately notified them about how it was using endorsements.
    Google may find, too, that by simply following a company or commenting on a post, users might not have meant their actions as endorsements.
    “The trick to any advertising like this is to avoid coming across as creepy to your user base and have them say, ‘I didn’t want anyone else to know that,’ ” said Zachary Reiss-Davis, an analyst at Forrester Research.
    Google said it would give users the chance to opt out of being included in the new endorsements, and people under the age of 18 will automatically be excluded. If a Google Plus user has shared comments with a limited set of people, only people in that circle will see the personalized ads. Ratings and reviews on services like Google Plus Local are automatically public and can be used in ads, unless a user opts out of shared endorsements.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/12/te...orsements.html

    Don't be evil?
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.

    Voltaire


  2. #2
    TopDogger's Avatar
    TopDogger is online now Über Hund
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hellfire, AZ
    Posts
    3,101
    Thanks
    349
    Thanked 917 Times in 701 Posts
    If I use a persons face in an ad I am required to get a signed release from that person or I can be sued.

    Google will likely find that their blanket TOS that people could not opt out of will not cover them when a law suit ends up in an honest court. The problem is that a suit of this type will likely end up in Federal court, which has been not been honest or credible ever since Erik Holder took over. Plus, the Feds will go easy on them due to the importance of their NSA relationship.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin


  3. #3
    Franc Tireur is offline Senior Net Builder
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,119
    Thanks
    289
    Thanked 148 Times in 118 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TopDogger View Post
    If I use a persons face in an ad I am required to get a signed release from that person or I can be sued.

    Google will likely find that their blanket TOS that people could not opt out of will not cover them when a law suit ends up in an honest court. The problem is that a suit of this type will likely end up in Federal court, which has been not been honest or credible ever since Erik Holder took over. Plus, the Feds will go easy on them due to the importance of their NSA relationship.
    I guess you can opt out, but if it is buried deep into the bottom of a page, it is like no option at all. I believe that google is in a crusade to destroy any user privacy.They can make "money", hum? Let's take off the word money, and it will look like what they are: user privacy destroyer!

    The irony, is that google and Co don't really want to be transparent, but they really love us without clothes.
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.

    Voltaire


  4. #4
    TopDogger's Avatar
    TopDogger is online now Über Hund
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hellfire, AZ
    Posts
    3,101
    Thanks
    349
    Thanked 917 Times in 701 Posts
    When they forced everyone to accept their new TOS, you had to either agree to it or they shut down all of your Google accounts. For most people, that isn't really a choice.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin


  5. #5
    Franc Tireur is offline Senior Net Builder
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,119
    Thanks
    289
    Thanked 148 Times in 118 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TopDogger View Post
    When they forced everyone to accept their new TOS, you had to either agree to it or they shut down all of your Google accounts. For most people, that isn't really a choice.
    That's the concept of the freedom of choice made in google...
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.

    Voltaire


Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •