Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Google, Yahoo & Microsoft Unite On Canonical Tag To Reduce Duplicate Content Clutter

  1. #1
    Mike Dammann's Avatar
    Mike Dammann is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Geographically flexible
    Posts
    964
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    237
    Thanked 182 Times in 148 Posts

    Google, Yahoo & Microsoft Unite On Canonical Tag To Reduce Duplicate Content Clutter

    Google, Yahoo & Microsoft Unite On “Canonical Tag” To Reduce Duplicate Content Clutter

    The web is full of duplicate content. Search engines try to index and display the original or “canonical” version. Searchers only want to see one version in results. And site owners worry that if search engines find multiple versions of a page, their link credit will be diluted and they’ll lose ranking.
    For blood type dating go here. If your blood type is rhesus negative, go there. If you are bored and feel like liking a Facebook page, hit this one.

  2. #2
    Aquarezz's Avatar
    Aquarezz is offline Master Net Builder
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    3,851
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks
    683
    Thanked 591 Times in 463 Posts
    OMG, this sucks... I won't add those new links to all my pages LoL
    Maybe if there is no other option but... don't let it go to far xD

    Imagine Will has to do it on TF for every single category....

    Hmm.. I don't like the canonical tag


    Greetz
    |Nico Lawsons

  3. #3
    Will.Spencer's Avatar
    Will.Spencer is offline Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    5,033
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    1,010
    Thanked 2,327 Times in 1,258 Posts
    It will soon be built into every major CMS, so CMS users won't have to worry about it.

    I could code it into The Tech-FAQ in just a few minutes.
    Submit Your Webmaster Related Sites to the NB Directory
    I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.

  4. #4
    budhi1976's Avatar
    budhi1976 is offline Net Builder
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    372
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 71 Times in 54 Posts
    So if this canonical tag will be implemented into CMS such as Wordpress then I have nothing to worry about... In fact I don't really understand what is it for LOL...

  5. #5
    Will.Spencer's Avatar
    Will.Spencer is offline Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    5,033
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    1,010
    Thanked 2,327 Times in 1,258 Posts
    The official GoogleWebmasterCentral blog post is here.
    Submit Your Webmaster Related Sites to the NB Directory
    I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.

  6. #6
    Shenron's Avatar
    Shenron is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,900
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    561
    Thanked 548 Times in 368 Posts
    Wordpress Canonical URL Links Plugin can already be found here:

    Canonical URL links - Yoast - Tweaking Websites

    This is in fact great news if you ask me, specially if you're holding a lot of unique content sites and are able to easily implement this.

  7. #7
    Aquarezz's Avatar
    Aquarezz is offline Master Net Builder
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    3,851
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks
    683
    Thanked 591 Times in 463 Posts
    Well, if it's easy to implement and if it will be added to WP etc.. than it's fine for me

    No problem than, but no way I would do it for all my sites myself


    Greetz
    |Nico Lawsons

  8. #8
    Loko's Avatar
    Loko is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    964
    Thanks
    351
    Thanked 347 Times in 241 Posts
    I read Matt Cutts blog and watched his video/presentation as well as reading the GoogleWebmasterCentral blog. One thing is still not clear to me.

    All the pages on my website are reachable with or without 'www'. There are only 5 pages on my site and thus only 5 html files in the directory. Where are the duplicate pages if any? (I am not able to insert the canonical tag in the pages like this)

    I suspect that I am lacking basic understanding of what duplicate content really is. Or is it that all pages that are reachable with or without www on my site have nothing to do with duplicate content?

  9. #9
    TopDogger's Avatar
    TopDogger is offline Über Hund
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hellfire, AZ
    Posts
    3,029
    Thanks
    345
    Thanked 902 Times in 689 Posts
    There should be one and only one version of a URL for each page.Period. That's what the canonicalization issue is about.

    The duplicate pages can be URLs with and without the www. You need to set a standard and stick to it. In the past, most search engines would index both URLs, which artificially created duplicate content pages.

    If you have a site where a page can be loaded using http:// www . domainname.com/id=6 and http:// www . domainname.com/my-story/, you can sometimes create duplicate duplicate content issues.

    Even things like http:// www . domainname.com/ and http:// www . domainname.com/index.html could create duplicate URLs in search engine indexes.

    It has been a basic rule of SEO for 6 or 7 years to eliminate all duplicate URLs. The new tag just makes it easier. However, you cannot just use the URL for the current page, because you will just make the problem worse if multiple URLs for a page exist. You have to use whatever standard you set for your URLs.

    The 301 redirect has traditionally been used to resolve these types of issues. That also sets a standard, but you cannot use that unless you are on an Apache server. The new tag works with Microsoft servers, as well.

  10. #10
    Loko's Avatar
    Loko is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    964
    Thanks
    351
    Thanked 347 Times in 241 Posts
    Thanks for your reply. Your post makes sense and I understand what you are saying. This has also been explained by Matt Cutts.

    Perhaps I should formulate my question a bit different:
    How come I can access my site with and without 'www'. I don't have duplicate pages in the directory or folders on the server, at least not that I can see. I don't see a page where I can insert a canonical tag
    Or is it something I have to set at the hosting provider?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Need WP Help. duplicate content
    By Sami4u in forum Wordpress
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 9 November, 2009, 19:01 PM
  2. Duplicate Content and Multiple sites Issues - From Google Staff
    By thebookmarker in forum Content and Writing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 19 October, 2009, 08:09 AM
  3. Detecting Duplicate Content
    By GameOver in forum Business
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 17 May, 2009, 09:20 AM
  4. Quoting and Duplicate Content
    By GameOver in forum Forum Life
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 27 April, 2009, 01:09 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •