Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Matt Cutts on too many no-follows and over optimization

  1. #1
    m42's Avatar
    m42
    m42 is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    725
    Thanks
    686
    Thanked 493 Times in 299 Posts

    Matt Cutts on too many no-follows and over optimization

    The good news is, Google doesn't care how many no-follow links you have on your website.

    The bad news is, you should care, as no-follows may soon bleed PR.

    He isn't very clear on how Google handles over-optimization, but seems to hint that keyword stuffing may annoy more than your audience and competitors.

    We know manual checks often penalize Made For Adsense (MFA) sites, so the decision not to over-optimize should be a no-brainer anyway.

    Here's the video:

    (

    Diet Fads

  2. Thanked by:

    bogart (30 June, 2009)

  3. #2
    bogart's Avatar
    bogart is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,772
    Thanks
    1,886
    Thanked 776 Times in 609 Posts
    I wonder why google is concerned about key word stuffing? The adsense and googlebot both crawl as a loadsharing function. So I wonder how much value high kw density has?

    I added nofollow to ine of my blogs and it seems like the blog is ranking a little better.

  4. #3
    Dr. Stavros is offline Net Builder
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    152
    Thanks
    36
    Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
    Well, it seems as if there's no issue here. Just continue to write naturally, with a natural frequency of keywords, write with your readers in mind, and there won't be any problem.

    Ha!

  5. #4
    butternyk is offline Net Builder
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    84
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    keyword stuffing is not a new issue, it has been discouraged fromm the very beginning

  6. #5
    TopDogger's Avatar
    TopDogger is offline Über Hund
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hellfire, AZ
    Posts
    3,106
    Thanks
    350
    Thanked 918 Times in 702 Posts
    As m42 pointed out, the bad news is that no-follows may soon bleed PR.

    I read Matt's previous comments on this issue and quite frankly it doesn't make any sense that ANY PageRank should the bled off or passed with a nofollow. The original idea behind the nofollow attribute was supposed to be that the link did not count for anything.

    This is potentially a significant issue for WordPress blogs or any sites that have been automaticaly inserting nofollow attributes. I suspect it would increase the amount of spam comments with blogs.

    I also wonder if a link that passes some PR would inherit some of a penalty applied to a page it links to. The nofollow attribute was also supposed to prevent the inheritance of penalties, as well.
    Last edited by m42; 1 July, 2009 at 03:42 AM.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin


  7. #6
    m42's Avatar
    m42
    m42 is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    725
    Thanks
    686
    Thanked 493 Times in 299 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TopDogger
    As m42 pointed out, the bad news is that no-follows may soon bleed PR.
    Matt Cutts addressed this and has flat out stated that PR will not be passed. It looks like it will just evaporate:

    PageRank sculpting

    Thank goodness I was wrong!
    (

    Diet Fads

  8. #7
    Will.Spencer's Avatar
    Will.Spencer is offline Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    5,033
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    1,010
    Thanked 2,329 Times in 1,259 Posts
    I was a bit surprised to hear Matt come out and specifically state that there were no penalties against overusing nofollow -- I was beginning to think that the opposite was true.

    Googlers seem to always use keyword stuffing as the example of on-page spam. It seems like they must have some internal policy against using more modern/useful/interesting examples -- out of fear that they might accidentally give away some valuable intellectual property.
    Submit Your Webmaster Related Sites to the NB Directory
    I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.

  9. Thanked by:

    bogart (1 July, 2009)

  10. #8
    bogart's Avatar
    bogart is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,772
    Thanks
    1,886
    Thanked 776 Times in 609 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Will.Spencer View Post
    Googlers seem to always use keyword stuffing as the example of on-page spam. It seems like they must have some internal policy against using more modern/useful/interesting examples -- out of fear that they might accidentally give away some valuable intellectual property.
    Keyword stuffing seems to work when new sites get a fresh content boost.

    But keyword stuffing doesn't seem to help an established site.

  11. #9
    TopDogger's Avatar
    TopDogger is offline Über Hund
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hellfire, AZ
    Posts
    3,106
    Thanks
    350
    Thanked 918 Times in 702 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by m42 View Post
    Matt Cutts addressed this and has flat out stated that PR will not be passed. It looks like it will just evaporate:

    PageRank sculpting

    Thank goodness I was wrong!
    And that is the way it should be. There should not be any inheritance either way with a nofollow link.

    I thought I recently read something he said that appeared to indicate that nofollow links bled a minimal amount of PageRank.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin


  12. Thanked by:

    m42 (1 July, 2009)

  13. #10
    m42's Avatar
    m42
    m42 is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    725
    Thanks
    686
    Thanked 493 Times in 299 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TopDogger View Post
    And that is the way it should be. There should not be any inheritance either way with a nofollow link.

    I thought I recently read something he said that appeared to indicate that nofollow links bled a minimal amount of PageRank.
    Yes. I've been reading that quite a bit as well. Some SEO's/SEM's even said Google has been allowing no-follows to bleed PR for the past year.

    Figured I'd just go to the source.
    (

    Diet Fads

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Matt Cutts' Disclaimer
    By Franc Tireur in forum Search Engine News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 28 April, 2011, 12:36 PM
  2. Matt Cutts and URL Shorteners
    By TopDogger in forum Search Engine News
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 19 April, 2011, 02:02 AM
  3. Matt Cutts loses a bet
    By ruben in forum General Chat
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 1 November, 2009, 12:52 PM
  4. SEO Tips from Matt Cutts
    By Melissa in forum Promoting
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 21 July, 2009, 07:12 AM
  5. Shoemoney vs Matt Cutts
    By Shenron in forum Promoting
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 23 June, 2009, 06:49 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •